The story of God asking Abraham to sacrifice Isaac raises serious moral questions. What kind of God would demand a parent offer their only son in a test of devotion? Nothing in the promises given to Abraham suggests God’s covenant was conditional. God had already declared that Abraham’s descendants would flourish. Why introduce such horror now? 

The key may lie in the previous chapter, where Abraham plants a tamarisk tree at Beersheba. Throughout Israel’s history, sacred trees were associated with fertility cults, particularly the worship of Asherah, a goddess to whom firstborn sons were sometimes sacrificed. If Abraham was flirting with this cultural-religious symbolism, the “test” becomes less about divine cruelty and more about exposure. God reveals the logical end of that path: if you give yourself to these gods, this is what they will demand.

Genesis 22 then becomes an object lesson. Abraham is confronted with the true horror of child sacrifice and discovers that this is not God’s way. The ram provided in Isaac’s place reinforces the distinction: God does not desire the death of children. Divine worship is not about destroying life but about preserving it.

The story ultimately re-centres Abraham in trust. God’s promises are not secured through appeasing violent deities. They unfold through faithfulness to a Love that does not consume its children.

Genesis 22 challenges us to examine the “gods” we may unknowingly serve. What are we planting that could one day demand the lives of our children - literally or figuratively? Whenever devotion requires the sacrifice of the vulnerable, we are kneeling before false gods.

If it is not about Love, it is not about God. 

Adapted from the Liberated Life Bible Commentary: Genesis.

Find out more here.